On 02/06/2017 08:18 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Michal Privoznik wrote: >> ==11260== 1,006 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 106 of 111 >> ==11260== at 0x4C2AE5F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:297) >> ==11260== by 0x4C2BDFF: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:693) >> ==11260== by 0x4EA430B: virReallocN (viralloc.c:245) >> ==11260== by 0x4EA7C52: virBufferGrow (virbuffer.c:130) >> ==11260== by 0x4EA7D28: virBufferAdd (virbuffer.c:165) >> ==11260== by 0x4EA8E10: virBufferStrcat (virbuffer.c:718) >> ==11260== by 0x42D263: xenFormatXLDiskSrcNet (xen_xl.c:960) >> ==11260== by 0x42D4EB: xenFormatXLDiskSrc (xen_xl.c:1015) >> ==11260== by 0x42D870: xenFormatXLDisk (xen_xl.c:1101) >> ==11260== by 0x42DA89: xenFormatXLDomainDisks (xen_xl.c:1148) >> ==11260== by 0x42EAF8: xenFormatXL (xen_xl.c:1558) >> ==11260== by 0x40E85F: testCompareParseXML (xlconfigtest.c:105) >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Strange function name in $subject. s/xenFoxenFormatXLDisk/xenFormatXLDisk/ Ah, indeed. I've started writing the function name and then copy-pasted it. I am a giddy goat :-) > > ACK. Thanks, I've pushed this one. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
