Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] storage: Virtuozzo storage backend for storage pool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[...]

>> This series with the adjustments I made as a result of the series I
>> posted related to moving API's to storage_util is now pushed. I believe
>> I got the right things merged - please double check though so we can
>> make adjustments sooner rather than later.  That is grab the top,
>> compile, test, etc. as I don't have VSTORAGE pools installed so the
>> changes don't do much for me!
>>
>> John
> 
> Thanks a lot John! For taking part of my job =)
> 
> I have checked vstorage (start, build, create volume, etc) and sent
> small fix.
> 

My assumption the Unmount vs. Umount (my typo).... In any case, as it
turns out the Umount API broke a Freebsd build, so I had to modify both
_fs and _vstorage in order to just move the UMOUNT call back into their
own Stop API's rather than calling the generic API.

Built properly for me w/ _FS defined...  Just making sure the
--without-storage-fs build works properly - that'll take a few moments.

John

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux