Re: [PATCH] qemu-capabilities: Fix query-cpu-model-expansion on s390 with older kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/13/2017 05:04 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:18:11 -0500, Collin L. Walling wrote:
When running on s390 with a kernel that does not support cpu model checking and
with a Qemu new enough to support query-cpu-model-expansion, the gathering of qemu
capabilities will fail. Qemu responds to the query-cpu-model-expansion qmp
command with an error because the needed kernel ioct does not exist. When this
happens a guest cannot even be defined due to missing qemu capabilities data.

This patch fixes the problem by silently ignoring generic errors stemming from
calls to query-cpu-model-expansion.

Reported-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
index e767437..1662749 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
@@ -5041,6 +5041,15 @@ qemuMonitorJSONGetCPUModelExpansion(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
     if (qemuMonitorJSONCommand(mon, cmd, &reply) < 0)
         goto cleanup;

+    /* Some QEMU architectures have the query-cpu-model-expansion
+     * command, but return 'GenericError' instead of simply omitting
+     * the command entirely.
+     */

Hmm, this comment says something a bit different than the commit
message. I hope the issue described by this comment was fixed in QEMU
within the same release the query-cpu-model-expansion command was
introduced. But we need to fix this nevertheless to address what the
commit message describes.


The issue still exists in Qemu. I can work up a patch to handle it. My first
idea is to simply test that the ioctl exists and functions at Qemu
initialization and deregister the query-cpu-model-expansion command in the
event that the ioctl does not exist or fails. Thoughts?

However, we need to do a little bit more than just ignoring this error.
I'll send a v2 soon.

--
-- Jason J. Herne (jjherne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux