On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 11:23 -0500, John Ferlan wrote: > I'm "mostly" fine with the changes - would like resolution sooner than > later since I have a couple of things to add to news, but I didn't want > to cause you extra merge cycles ;-) Yeah, same here :) > The *one* thing I'm really having a hard time with is not ending > sentences with a period for <description>'s. What about <summary>? > Especially when there's > two or more sentences within a <description> where the first one ends > with a period, but the second one doesn't > > Not ending the previous paragraph without a period was really difficult > for my fingers. I wouldn't hold up a ACK though for having or not > having a period. Patch 1/3 translates the current entries directly to the new format, without any kind of editing. As I've said before, I have zero problems having leading periods for all sentences in the release notes, especially if you feel so strongly about it :) We will have to change them all, though: an inconsistent style just won't do. So, will you ACK this series if I promise to follow up with a patch that adds leading periods to all <description>s? -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
