Re: [libvirt] getFreeMemory reporting incorrectly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Daniel,

Is it fair to assume this fix may appear in the next release of libvirt?

Hany

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:13:17PM -0400, Hany Fahim wrote:
> My apologies. Here it is:
> Xen 3.3:
>
> [root@node1 ~]# xm info
> total_memory           : 3063
> free_memory            : 128
> node_to_cpu            : node0:0-1
> node_to_memory         : node0:128
> xen_major              : 3
> xen_minor              : 3
> xen_extra              : .1

>
> Xen 3.0.3:
>
> [root@node2 ~]# xm info
> total_memory           : 2046
> free_memory            : 256
> node_to_cpu            : node0:0
> xen_major              : 3
> xen_minor              : 1
> xen_extra              : .2-128.1.6.el5


This shows that the Hypervisor  is giving correct info back with both
versions. So the problem must be at the libvirt space, and I believe
I know what the problem is.

The version of Xen in RHEL5 has

struct xen_sysctl_availheap {
   /* IN variables. */
   uint32_t min_bitwidth;  /* Smallest address width (zero if don't care). */
   uint32_t max_bitwidth;  /* Largest address width (zero if don't care). */
   int32_t  node;          /* NUMA node of interest (-1 for all nodes). */
   /* OUT variables. */
   uint64_t avail_bytes;   /* Bytes available in the specified region. */
};

While upstream Xen has

struct xen_sysctl_availheap {
   /* IN variables. */
   uint32_t min_bitwidth;  /* Smallest address width (zero if don't care). */
   uint32_t max_bitwidth;  /* Largest address width (zero if don't care). */
   int32_t  node;          /* NUMA node of interest (-1 for all nodes). */
   /* OUT variables. */
   uint64_aligned_t avail_bytes;/* Bytes available in the specified region. */
};

Notice the 'avail_bytes' field is now aligned, so its 4 bytes further
down from where libvirt is expecting it to be.

We'll have to provide a fix in libvirt to use the new alignment for
newer Xen.

Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]