05-Jan-17 19:53, John Ferlan пишет:
On 12/09/2016 09:28 AM, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
As specifying both QEMU_CAPS_NO_KVM_PIT and QEMU_CAPS_KVM_PIT_TICK_POLICY
capabilities has no practical sense in tests, and we already have tests
for QEMU_CAPS_KVM_PIT_TICK_POLICY, it's better to add a separate one with
QEMU_CAPS_NO_KVM_PIT set.
My suggested alteration:
tests: Add "no-kvm-pit-device" testcase
Add a test case for when the QEMU_CAPS_NO_KVM_PIT capability is set.
This capability is mutually exclusive to QEMU_CAPS_KVM_PIT_TICK_POLICY
and results in the same output regardless of whether "discard" or
"delay" was specified in the guest XML for 'tickpolicy'.
ACK -
John
Your wording is better. Thanks for the review.
Maxim
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
