On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 10:25 -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > With the advent of VIR_PCI_CONNECT_AGGREGATE_SLOT, the new name is > more appropriate, since the address contained may be another address s/contained/returned/ ? > on the same slot as last time, not necessarily a new slot. ACK -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list