Re: [PATCH] Deal with gnutls 3.5.6 regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:15:12AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Anyone want to review this, if not I'll just claim its a build
breaker fix...

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:56:43AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 12:04:36PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I was not originally planning to do anything for the gnutls 3.5.6
> regression:
>
>   https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-November/msg00816.html
>
> but there's still no immediate sign of the new 3.5.7 release,
> so while I still don't want to workaround the bug in libvirt,
> we can at least blacklist that version of gnutls in the test
> suite, so 'make check' passes on affected systems while we're
> waiting for 3.5.7 to arrive.

3.5.7 has just hit Fedora updates-testing, but I figure we
might as well still blacklist 3.5.6 in our tests


Isn't the point of the test suite to also fail on broken systems?

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux