On 12/03/2016 07:09 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
ping?
Sorry, I seem to have lost your initial cover letter so responding here...
On 11/18/2016 09:26 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349696
Lots of details in the bz, but essentially the problem is that providing
a "parent" scsi_hostX value has drawbacks on reboots because what was
scsi_hostX could turn into scsi_hostY on subsequent reboots.
So add the ability to use the parent wwnn/wwpn or fabric_wwn as 'search'
criteria in order to create either non persistent vHBA's via nodedev or
persistent vHBA's via storage pools.
I've not looked at all the patches in detail, but I have been giving them a fair
bit of testing and haven't noticed any problems thus far.
Once question I do have is related to volume detection in vport-based pools.
Currently when there are multiple paths to a LUN only the active ones are
displayed in the pool. Inactive paths are ignored since saferead() fails in
src/storage/storage_backend.c:virStorageBackendDetectBlockVolFormatFD(). Without
the inactive paths, there would be no path to the LUN if it was trespassed. I
made the below hack to virStorageBackendUpdateVolTargetInfo() to show the
inactive paths too, and was able to pass those to the guest allowing it to
handle multipathing. Is there a reason the inactive paths are ignored?
Regards,
Jim
Index: libvirt-2.5.0/src/storage/storage_backend.c
===================================================================
--- libvirt-2.5.0.orig/src/storage/storage_backend.c
+++ libvirt-2.5.0/src/storage/storage_backend.c
@@ -1941,8 +1941,11 @@ virStorageBackendUpdateVolTargetInfo(vir
if (withBlockVolFormat) {
if ((ret = virStorageBackendDetectBlockVolFormatFD(target, fd,
- readflags)) < 0)
+ readflags)) < 0) {
+ if (ret == -2)
+ ret = 0;
goto cleanup;
+ }
}
cleanup:
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
