On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:57:06AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:28:33PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:23:55PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:05:52PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > > Since we are useing Overpass for the web pages, we might be using the > > > > s/useing/using/ > > > > > > latest version. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Notes: > > > > I'm not sure where Dan got the hinted versions. Also what version > > > > that is. The upstream repository of the Overpass font is unusable for > > > > > > The previous version was only officially avaiable in TTF format, so I > > > used transfonter to generate the web font version: > > > > > > http://transfonter.org/ > > > > > > I enabled hinting since it was said to display better in Windows, but > > > I have no way of checking that personally. I don't think it is particularly > > > important - unless you really want to test windows I'd just stick to the > > > official woff files. > > > > > > > getting any info. So I also removed 'thin' and 'heavy' versions (with > > > > their "extra" variants. > > > > > > You seem to have added as many variants as you removed, so not sure about > > > this last sentance. > > > > There are more variants in v3.0 than there were before. So I removed > the ones that were not in the previous version so that I add as many > variants as I remove =) > > > Oh but ACK regardless - please don't resend this huge patch just push > > it :-) > > > > Sorry for that. I was initially thinking that we could just add the > repo as another submodule, that wouldn't add that much data to our git, > neither would it make me send such a huge patch. The next patch would > be also big, but I forgot to 'git add' the monospace woff files. Let me > know if you are in favor of the submodule rather and if not, I'll push > these three patches and will wait for the consensus on 4/4 that could be > slightly better as mentioned in other thread. I don't think we need the complication that submodules brings - its likely to be many years before we care about getting an update Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
