Re: [PATCH 0/4] docs: User Overpass 3.0 as a font

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18.11.2016 16:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> I heard Overpass 3.0 was released, so let's update to that.  There are
>> some changes that I noticed.  There are more font weights than we had
>> before.  The one we decided to use is now probably the 'semibold' one.
>> So the regular font is a little thinner, but not as much as the
>> 'light' one.  I think this time it is the perfect middle ground
> 
> Yep, a little bit thinner is exactly what I wanted but couldn't
> get with previous version :-)
> 
>> between the discussed variants in the previous thread.  Also it makes
>> the mono font the same size as the other font.  I kinda like that, but
>> if others don't, we can add font-size: 12px; to the style.
> 
> I think I could see benefit in the monospace font being one or two pt
> smaller that in your screenshot, because monospace text gets very
> wide very quickly

Exactly what I wanted to say. With the current version I can clearly see
difference between say <code/> and the regular test. With your patches
is not that visible in a block of text.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux