Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add VCPU halted to domain statistics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/24/2016 11:24 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 24.10.2016 16:29, John Ferlan wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> The series looks good to me - do you think it's worthwhile to mention
>> anywhere in virsh.pod that the "halted" could mean "really halted" or
>> "not scheduled" or "not actively processing" depending on architecture?
>> (and how best to say it).
> As the other values' documentation is quite terse, I was tempted to stay
> in style by being brief as well. Maybe something along the lines of:
> ... halted: yes or no (may indicate the processor is idle or even
> disabled, depending on the architecture).

Perfect - I went with that.

>>
>> I can tweak virsh.pod before pushing based on your or others
>> feedback/thoughts.
>>
> Surely no objections from my side.
> [...]
> 
> 

Now pushed

John

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]