Re: [PATCH v4 00/25] Use more PCIe less legacy PCI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 15:53 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> The latest version of patches to auto-assign appropriate devices in
> PCIe-capable domains to PCIe slots rather than legacy PCI, and to also
> auto-add pcie-root-ports as necessary to make this easier.
> 
> I *think* I've dealt with all of Andrea's great critiques of V3,
> either in my email responses or in these revised patches. Aside from
> fixing typos and formatting problems, I also moved several "little
> cosmetic fixes" out of the bigger functionality-changing patches, and
> also split out the most confusing part of patch 20 (previously patch
> 15 - the one that auto-adds pcie-root-port and dmi-to-pci-bridge
> controllers) into its own patch (doubly useful since the value of that
> part of the patch is dubious - it is now the [RFC] patch 21)
> 
> As many of the simple costmetic patches as possible were pushed up to
> the front of the series (if they weren't already there). If those are
> ACKed on this round but others aren't, I'll push them immediately so I
> don't need to resubmit the whole series again.

I think you can go ahead and push patches 2-11 now - of
course after taking care of the trivial stuff I pointed out
during this last round of reviews.

Patch 1 doesn't make sense until patch 12, so please hold off
pushing that one for the time being.

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]