On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:42 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:19 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > > Andrea, > > there is another "side effect" of the Requires directive. > > libvirt-guests gets automatically started when libvirt is updated to > > v2.3.0. This has some rather nasty implications for the end users. > > Mh, I don't see why that would happen. > > The Requires relationship goes in the opposite direction, > so if libvirt-guests was not running before the upgrade > there should be no reason for it to be started, whether > that relationship is there or not. > > I'll try to reproduce this on my machine and get back to > you in a while. I tried upgrading from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0 a bunch of times, but I haven't been able to reproduce the failure you're reporting: libvirt-guests is never started automatically. Can you provide more information? What distribution are you using? Are you building from source, or using your distribution's packages? Are you sure libvirt-guests was not running even before upgrade? -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list