Re: Some maintenance back-ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:48:24PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
I wanted to back-port commit 4372a7845acbc6974f6027ef68e7dd3eeb47f425 to

Of course I prepared this mail before updating all the branches and
forgot to fix the commit hash.  The proper one is:

 ff3112f3dc2c276a7e387ff7bb86f4fbbdf7bf2c [1]

Martin

[1] https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=ff3112f3dc2c

various maintenance branches due to the fact that it changes how
migration behaves and that would fix it for future uses at leas.  I
found out some compilation problems (mainly because I switched to gcc
6.2.0).  I wanted to make it easier for others (well, Cole) to make a
maintenance release, so I back-ported some other stuff to make various
maint branches compile.  All of them were trivial build-fixers and there
were few per each branch and I think it's pretty pointless to send each
of them to the list (and I'm also lazy).  But in case you're interested,
feel free to check and complain if you hate what I did, just so I know
for next time.

Have a nice day,
Martin



--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]