On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 04:23:32PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote: > On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:15 +0530, Nehal J Wani wrote: > > > > Seems like the previous experiment involved a happy accident indeed. > > > > So, what are we going to do about libvirt+dnsmasq's handling of expired > leases now? IMHO nothing. Once a lease has expired all bets are off, so any behaviour is valid and you have to expect you'll get a different IP address at some point. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list