On 13.09.2016 19:03, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/13/2016 06:02 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >>> So, just to make it crystal clear, is this what you're saying? >>> >>> ready | initial C/R |fudged C/R >> >> Oh, This should have been C/E instead of C/R. Current/End. 'e' and 'r' >> keys are just too close to each other :-) >> >>> ------+-------------+---------- >>> < 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 >>> = 0 | 0/0 | 0/1 >>> > 0 | 0/0 | 1/1 > > Yes, I think that's the best. Then we have documented to apps higher in > the stack that if they see 0/0, it is because qemu is too old to give us > a definitive answer; in all other cases, we have fudged data so that > higher layers don't have to worry about 0/0. > Thank you guys, I've pushed the patch then (with the behaviour as described in the table). Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list