On 08/12/2016 09:33 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> The function filters all CPU features through a given callback while
> copying CPU model related parts of a CPU definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> src/conf/cpu_conf.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> src/conf/cpu_conf.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/cpu_conf.c b/src/conf/cpu_conf.c
> index 13f3da3..b74c48b 100644
> --- a/src/conf/cpu_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/cpu_conf.c
> @@ -86,28 +86,45 @@ virCPUDefCopyModel(virCPUDefPtr dst,
> const virCPUDef *src,
> bool resetPolicy)
> {
> + return virCPUDefCopyModelFilter(dst, src, resetPolicy, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +
> +int ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2)
Any particular advantage to putting the NONNULL in both the .h file and
here? I see virCPUDefCopyModel is similar.
> +virCPUDefCopyModelFilter(virCPUDefPtr dst,
> + const virCPUDef *src,
> + bool resetPolicy,
> + virCPUDefFeatureFilter filter,
> + void *opaque)
> +{
[...]
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list