On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 22:31 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > > This change means we no longer have to cast arrays of > > > > immutable strings to arrays of mutable strings; we still > > > > have to do the opposite, though, but that's reasonable. > > > > > > Is it? I mean, we are restricting ourselves and compiler fails to see > > > that. To me 'const char **' is more restrictive than 'char **' therefore > > > there should be no typecast required. But this is the discussion I > > > should have with gcc devels. For some reason, gcc does automatic > > > typecasting to const just for the fist level pointers and not the second > > > one. That's why compilers errors out. > > > > The reason for this behavior is explained in the C FAQ: > > > > http://c-faq.com/ansi/constmismatch.html > > Just FYI, so that you know why adding more consts (even to sensible > places) doesn't help in C, I found the answer to my question on stack > overflow [1] very satisfactory and explanatory. So the solution is simple: rewrite all of libvirt in C++! ;) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list