| On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:20:10 Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:20:23PM -0500, Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: > > Anyone? :( I really don't want to have to bring up a whole new box just > > do do dev work that I should be able to do from my Mac. I guess I can > > write against the Java bindings locally and then debug remotely on a > > Linux server. > > Well, not that many people seems interested in porting to OS-X, > partly I guess because there is no support there for KVM or Xen. > I don't know what hypervisor could be used there, but for remote try to do this, but in spare time as that is not on my todo list as of now. > > W.r.t. the "new box" send me a Mac OS-X one an I may verify compile > errors here, if not, well someone else will have to send portability > patches ! If they are clean and don't break other arches I will be > happy to push them ! But you can't held us responsible for the fact > you use a given platform for your libvirt developments. You "should > be able to do from my Mac" if "someone" made the little effort of > providing patches and checking, it's open source, it's free after > all, right ? Pritesh |
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list