Re: [PATCH 01/16] hyperv: additional server 2008 wmi classes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It doesn’t exist in the SOAP response


> On Aug 9, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jason Miesionczek
> <jmiesionczek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> +class Win32_OperatingSystem
>> +       string   BootDevice
>> +       string   BuildNumber
>> +       string   BuildType
>> +       string   Caption
>> +       string   CodeSet
>> +       string   CountryCode
>> +       string   CreationClassName
>> +       string   CSCreationClassName
>> +       string   CSDVersion
>> +       string   CSName
>> +       uint16   CurrentTimeZone
>> +       boolean  DataExecutionPrevention_Available
>> +       boolean  DataExecutionPrevention_32BitApplications
>> +       boolean  DataExecutionPrevention_Drivers
>> +       uint8    DataExecutionPrevention_SupportPolicy
>> +       boolean  Debug
>> +       string   Description
>> +       boolean  Distributed
>> +       uint32   EncryptionLevel
>> +       uint8    ForegroundApplicationBoost
>> +       uint64   FreePhysicalMemory
>> +       uint64   FreeSpaceInPagingFiles
>> +       uint64   FreeVirtualMemory
>> +       datetime InstallDate
>> +       uint32   LargeSystemCache
>> +       datetime LastBootUpTime
>> +       datetime LocalDateTime
>> +       string   Locale
>> +       string   Manufacturer
>> +       uint32   MaxNumberOfProcesses
>> +       uint64   MaxProcessMemorySize
>> +       string   MUILanguages[]
>> +       string   Name
>> +       uint32   NumberOfLicensedUsers
>> +       uint32   NumberOfProcesses
>> +       uint32   NumberOfUsers
>> +       uint32   OperatingSystemSKU
>> +       string   Organization
>> +       string   OSArchitecture
>> +       uint32   OSLanguage
>> +       uint32   OSProductSuite
>> +       uint16   OSType
>> +       string   OtherTypeDescription
>> +       boolean  PAEEnabled
>> +       string   PlusProductID
>> +       string   PlusVersionNumber
>> +  #    boolean  PortableOperatingSystem
>> +       boolean  Primary
>> +       uint32   ProductType
>> +       string   RegisteredUser
>> +       string   SerialNumber
>> +       uint16   ServicePackMajorVersion
>> +       uint16   ServicePackMinorVersion
>> +       uint64   SizeStoredInPagingFiles
>> +       string   Status
>> +       uint32   SuiteMask
>> +       string   SystemDevice
>> +       string   SystemDirectory
>> +       string   SystemDrive
>> +       uint64   TotalSwapSpaceSize
>> +       uint64   TotalVirtualMemorySize
>> +       uint64   TotalVisibleMemorySize
>> +       string   Version
>> +       string   WindowsDirectory
>> +end
>> +
> 
> Why is "boolean PortableOperatingSystem" commented out in the
> Win32_OperatingSystem class?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]