On 25.07.2016 22:48, Eric Farman wrote: > In the case of other SCSI host devices, the device that is created > within the guest will be within the usual SCSI namespace > (e.g., host:bus:target:lun). But for vhost-scsi, the actual naming > structure will come from the host configuration, and will be > invisible to both QEMU and Libvirt. So specifying one with an > <address type='drive' ...> tag (as is often done for virtio-scsi) > doesn't make sense in this case, as it will be ignored. > > Nevertheless, we need something to identify our vhost-scsi device, > so for that we'll drop back to the devno mapping that we use for > other disks. (This option exists only for vhost-scsi-ccw, but not > vhost-scsi-pci. Hrm...) This becomes <address type='ccw' ...> in > the case of s390 systems, and puts the device number on the > resulting QEMU command line. Thus, existing device number conflict > detection can be used across other devices that may or may not be > specified in the guest XML. > > If one is not specified, we need to be sure to allocate one so that > we can avoid polluting the device numbers with silently-created > entries. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 7 +++++++ > src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) I don't feel confident enough to review this one. The code looks okay, but from higher perspective I have no idea what it does. Sorry. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list