The virDomainPCIAddressFlagsCompatible() error logs report that a device required a controller that accepted standard PCI endpoint devices, or PCI Express endpoint devices, and if hotplug was required by the configuration but not provided by the selected controller. But the wording of the error messages was apparently confusing (according to the bugzilla report referenced below). On top of that, if the device was something other than an endpoint device (e.g. a pcie-switch-downstream-port) the error message was a complete punt - it would just say that the flags were incorrect. This patch makes the messages for PCI/PCIe endpoint and hotplug requirements more clear, and also specifically indicates what was the device type when it is other than an endpoint device. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363627 --- src/conf/domain_addr.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/conf/domain_addr.c b/src/conf/domain_addr.c index a0c2f88..98176e2 100644 --- a/src/conf/domain_addr.c +++ b/src/conf/domain_addr.c @@ -118,38 +118,46 @@ virDomainPCIAddressFlagsCompatible(virPCIDeviceAddressPtr addr, * hot-plug and this bus doesn't have it, return false. */ if (!(devFlags & busFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPES_MASK)) { - if (reportError) { - if (devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCI_DEVICE) { - virReportError(errType, - _("PCI bus is not compatible with the device " - "at %s. Device requires a standard PCI slot, " - "which is not provided by bus %.4x:%.2x"), - addrStr, addr->domain, addr->bus); - } else if (devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_DEVICE) { - virReportError(errType, - _("PCI bus is not compatible with the device " - "at %s. Device requires a PCI Express slot, " - "which is not provided by bus %.4x:%.2x"), - addrStr, addr->domain, addr->bus); - } else { - /* this should never happen. If it does, there is a - * bug in the code that sets the flag bits for devices. - */ - virReportError(errType, - _("The device information for %s has no PCI " - "connection types listed"), addrStr); - } + const char *connectStr; + + if (!reportError) + return false; + + if (devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCI_DEVICE) { + connectStr = "standard PCI device"; + } else if (devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_DEVICE) { + connectStr = "PCI Express device"; + } else if (devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_ROOT_PORT) { + connectStr = "pcie-root-port"; + } else if (devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_SWITCH_UPSTREAM_PORT) { + connectStr = "pci-switch-upstream-port"; + } else if (devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_SWITCH_DOWNSTREAM_PORT) { + connectStr = "pci-switch-downstream-port"; + } else { + /* this should never happen. If it does, there is a + * bug in the code that sets the flag bits for devices. + */ + virReportError(errType, + _("The device at PCI address %s has " + "unrecognized connection type flags 0x%.2x"), + addrStr, devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPES_MASK); + return false; } + virReportError(errType, + _("The device at PCI address %s cannot be " + "plugged into the PCI controller with index 0x%.2x. " + "It requires a controller that accepts a %s."), + addrStr, addr->bus, connectStr); return false; } if ((devFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_HOTPLUGGABLE) && !(busFlags & VIR_PCI_CONNECT_HOTPLUGGABLE)) { if (reportError) { virReportError(errType, - _("PCI bus is not compatible with the device " - "at %s. Device requires hot-plug capability, " - "which is not provided by bus %.4x:%.2x"), - addrStr, addr->domain, addr->bus); + _("The device at PCI address %s requires " + "hot-plug capability, but the PCI controller " + "at index %.2x doesn't support hot-plug"), + addrStr, addr->bus); } return false; } -- 2.7.4 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list