Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] conf: add node_device_event handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/03/2016 09:40 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/28/2016 08:02 AM, Jovanka Gulicoska wrote:
>> Add node device event handling infrastructure to node_device_event.[ch]
>> ---
>>  src/Makefile.am              |   5 +
>>  src/conf/node_device_event.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  src/conf/node_device_event.h |  59 +++++++++++
>>  src/libvirt_private.syms     |   5 +
>>  4 files changed, 303 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 src/conf/node_device_event.c
>>  create mode 100644 src/conf/node_device_event.h
>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> diff --git a/src/conf/node_device_event.c b/src/conf/node_device_event.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..61bc912
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleNew:
>> + * @name: name of the node device object the event describes
>> + * @type: type of lifecycle event
>> + * @detail: more details about @type
>> + *
>> + * Create a new node device lifecycle event.
>> + */
>> +virObjectEventPtr
>> +virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleNew(const char *name,
>> +                               int type,
>> +                               int detail)
>> +{
>> +    virNodeDeviceEventLifecyclePtr event;
>> +
>> +    if (virNodeDeviceEventsInitialize() < 0)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    if (!(event = virObjectEventNew(virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleClass,
>> +                                    virNodeDeviceEventDispatchDefaultFunc,
>> +                                    VIR_NODE_DEVICE_EVENT_ID_LIFECYCLE,
>> +                                    0, name, NULL, name)))
>                                                 ^^^^
> 
> This has caused a Coverity build failure since the prototype has:
> 
> ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(6)
> 

I think just dropping it is fine? The code was updated to handle uuid=NULL

diff --git a/src/conf/object_event_private.h b/src/conf/object_event_private.h
index 92c25d4..27b461f 100644
--- a/src/conf/object_event_private.h
+++ b/src/conf/object_event_private.h
@@ -106,6 +106,6 @@ virObjectEventNew(virClassPtr klass,
                   const unsigned char *uuid,
                   const char *key)
     ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(5)
-    ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(6) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(7);
+    ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(7);

 #endif

> It gets even worse in the function and needs to be resolved before the
> "next" release.
> 

I can't parse this sentence... are there additional issues?

Thanks,
Cole

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]