On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:07:10AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> At least with systemd v210, NOTIFY_SOCKET is abstact, e.g.
> @/org/freedesktop/systemd1/notify. sendmsg() fails on such a socket
> with "Connection refused". The unix(7) man page contains the following
> details wrt abstract socket addresses
>
> abstract: an abstract socket address is distinguished (from a
> pathname socket) by the fact that sun_path[0] is a null byte
> ('\0'). The socket's address in this namespace is given by the
> additional bytes in sun_path that are covered by the specified
> length of the address structure. (Null bytes in the name have
> no special significance.)
>
> So we need to be more precise about the address length, setting it to
> the sizeof sa_family_t + length of address copied to sun_path instead
> of setting it to the sizeof the entire sockaddr_un struct.
>
> Resolves: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=987668
> Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>
ACK
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list