On 10/05/16 01:47, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 05/04/2016 10:30 AM, Erik Skultety wrote: >> In this particular case, reset is meant as clearing the whole list of >> outputs/filters, not resetting it to a predefined default setting. Looking at >> it from that perspective, returning the number of records removed doesn't help >> the caller in any way (not that any of the callers would actually check for >> it). Well, callers could detect an error from the number of successfully >> removed records, but the only thing that can fail in virLogReset is force >> closing a file descriptor in which case the error isn't propagated back to >> virLogReset anyway. Conclusion: there is no practical use for having a return >> type of 'int' rather than 'void' in this case. > > ACK > > - Cole > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > Thanks, pushed. Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list