On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:41:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:37:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This fixes a build for me with upstream libvirt.NACK, per my reply to John's original patch, I think this should not have been added to libvirt API in the first place.
I missed that. Looking at it now I was wondering why we have special purpose, dedicated secrets to that they are used safely and now we have general-purpose secret. OK, good to know, I haven't thought of that, I just wanted to fix the test. Thanks for the info.
Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list