On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:53 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote: > > By the way, should mingw-libvirt.spec.in updated to ship > > the virsh and virt-admin binaries in separate -client and > > -admin packages? > > > > Does shipping a mingw version virt-admin even make sense, > > given that AFAIK it doesn't (yet) work on remote daemons? > > Well, I didn't add it to the mingw spec file for that^ specific reason, > but according to > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-July/msg00022.html it > broke the the build on mingw apparently. I assume any breakage would have been caused by the fact that the libvirt-admin DLL and header files were missing; those should definitely be included in the package. What I'm wondering is whether the virt-admin executable should be shipped at all. > However, I wouldn't bother > splitting the packages to -client and -admin on mingw at the moment, > it's just not worth it IMHO. I don't have a strong opinion either way, I just though I would bring it up for discussion :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list