On 27/06/16 20:28, Cole Robinson wrote: > Similar to what virsh and virt-login-shell do > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315 > --- > I can't actually reproduce the bug, the backtrace is similar to > 97973ebb7 which added the same fix for virt-login-shell, and > that commit also mentions the randomness of reproducing... > > tools/virt-admin.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/virt-admin.c b/tools/virt-admin.c > index 4acac65..7bff5c3 100644 > --- a/tools/virt-admin.c > +++ b/tools/virt-admin.c > @@ -1371,6 +1371,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) > return EXIT_FAILURE; > } > > + if (virInitialize() < 0) { > + vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Failed to initialize libvirt")); > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > + } > + > virFileActivateDirOverride(argv[0]); > > if (!vshInit(ctl, cmdGroups, NULL)) > So, based on Luyao's feedback on the modified patch I attached to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315, ACK if you replace virInitialize call with virAdmInitialize (do not forget to export the symbol through public syms :)...). I keep wondering though, why none of us (you, me, and Martin) was able to reproduce it even once. Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list