Re: [PATCH] storage: Remove redundant refreshPool check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:29:35PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Every driver provides a refreshPool impl, and many other critical
places in the code unconditionally call it without checking if
it exists, so this check is pointless

I'm not entirely sure about it, but it'd be nicer if we actually checked
that it's non-NULL.  Just to future-proof the code in case someone adds
another backend.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]