On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:34 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > There is a difference between KVM not being built properly / > > shipped / loaded and the host not supporting hardware > > virtualization at all. We capture that difference on x86 > > and s390, but not on aarch64 and ppc64. > > > > Is figuring out whether hardware virtualization support is > > present just not feasible on aarch64, eg. because each > > reports the information in a different way, or because the > > information is not exposed to userspace at all? > > The information isn't exposed to userspace. The closest thing > we have is looking at kernel error messages when kvm is initialized. > Lack of virtualization support on arm64 is usually a firmware issue. I see. Let's leave it as it is then. -- Andrea Bolognani Software Engineer - Virtualization Team -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list