27.05.2016 12:20, Nikolay Shirokovskiy пишет:
On 26.05.2016 13:14, Maxim Nestratov wrote:when additional information is asked PrlJob_GetError an error PRL_ERR_NO_DATA should not be treated as error Signed-off-by: Maxim Nestratov <mnestratov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- src/vz/vz_sdk.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/vz/vz_sdk.c b/src/vz/vz_sdk.c index 7fc7d97..bad4ddd 100644 --- a/src/vz/vz_sdk.c +++ b/src/vz/vz_sdk.c @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ getJobResultHelper(PRL_HANDLE job, unsigned int timeout, PRL_HANDLE *result, PRL_HANDLE err_handle;/* Sometimes it's possible to get additional error info. */- if ((ret = PrlJob_GetError(job, &err_handle))) { + ret = PrlJob_GetError(job, &err_handle); + if (ret && ret != PRL_ERR_NO_DATA) { logPrlErrorHelper(ret, filename, funcname, linenr); goto cleanup; }I would log and return in case of PRL_ERR_NO_DATA or it is rather compilicated to call logPrlEventErrorHelper only to return immediately.
I squashed this patch with the previous and reworked it a bit. Sent a new version. Maxim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list