Re: [PATCH] spec: Advertise nvram paths of official fedora edk2 builds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 12:59 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > Most importantly... Why are those paths so ugly and
> > inconsistent? :S
> 
> The OVMF stuff is to roughly match the naming of the original RHEL packages,
> and with aarch64 which came later the file names were intended to be improved,
> but side by side it just makes things look inconsistent.

So much for improvement! Oh well.

> > [1] There are actually two entries, only the second one has
> >     the right paths
> 
> Hmm, what do you mean exactly? The stock qemu.conf nvram paths match the RHEL
> packages, they look correct to me.

Never mind, that was just me messing with the local
configuration file after all :)

-- 
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]