Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] storage: Use virSecretGetSecretString

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:52:50 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> Rather than inline code secret lookup for rbd/iscsi, use the common function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/Makefile.am                     |  1 +
>  src/storage/storage_backend_iscsi.c | 50 +++++--------------------------------
>  src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c   | 48 +++--------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am
> index f3c9a14..019242b 100644
> --- a/src/Makefile.am
> +++ b/src/Makefile.am
> @@ -1615,6 +1615,7 @@ libvirt_driver_storage_impl_la_SOURCES =
>  libvirt_driver_storage_impl_la_CFLAGS = \
>  		-I$(srcdir)/access \
>  		-I$(srcdir)/conf \
> +		-I$(srcdir)/secret \

Similarly to my complaint in 5/5 this is breaking the boundaries between
the storage driver and the secret driver. This is not the first case of
this though so we just need to thoroughly check that the appropriate
bits are linked in to the storage driver.

I'll need to check this.

Otherwise looks good.

Peter

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]