On 31.05.2016 12:52, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:33:26 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> As unlikely as it might seem, func passed to this function can >> return NULL. And in some cases it indeed does so: >> virDomainDefGetVcpuSched and virDomainDefGetIOThreadSched. >> However, the function I'm fixing blindly dereference value func >> returned thus leading to SIGSEGV. > > Same as in the coverity case complaining about this it won't happen here > since we are iterating a known list of items that was collected > beforehand and thus no crashing will happen. > Well, having covery reports a false positive is one thing, being unable to compile is another one. This is what I was afraid of and expressed it here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-May/msg02063.html On the other hand, you use more recent compiler than I do, so you'll hit these error sooner O:-) IOW, one day we will have to deal with this. Again. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list