On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:23:50PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> In order to allow <address type='pci'/> with no other attributes to
> mean "I want a PCI address, but any PCI address will do" (just as
> having no <address> at all usually indicates), we will need to change
> several places in the code from a simple "info->type == (or !=)
> VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_(PCI|NONE)" into something slightly
> more complex, this patch adds to new functions that take a
> virDomainDeviceInfoPtr and return true/false depending on 1) whether
> the current state of the info indicates that we "want" a PCI address
> for this device (virDeviceInfoPCIAddressWanted()) and 2) whether this
> device already has a valid PCI address
> (virDeviceInfoPCIAddressPresent()).
>
> Both of these functions required the simpler check for whether a pci
> address is "empty" (i.e. all of its attributes are 0, which can never
> happen in a real PCI address, since slot 0 of bus 0 of domain 0 is
> always reserved), so that function is also added.
> ---
> src/conf/device_conf.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/device_conf.h b/src/conf/device_conf.h
> index 46c720d..847564b 100644
> --- a/src/conf/device_conf.h
> +++ b/src/conf/device_conf.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,27 @@ typedef struct _virDomainDeviceInfo {
> int virPCIDeviceAddressIsValid(virPCIDeviceAddressPtr addr,
> bool report);
>
> +static inline bool
I think inline keywords are pointless nowadays. Some compilers will
inline the functions even if you don't want them to.
Jan
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list