Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On 04/09/09 16:03, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> I don't want multiplexed monitor sessions, at all.
>>
>> I'm very happy to finally see them. Finally one can run vms with
>> libvirt and *still* access the monitor for debugging and development
>> purposes.
>>
>
> Right, I like them for that purpose as well. But not for ordinary control.
How do you want to differentiate? What further complications would this
bring us?
>
>>> I want async
>>> notifications added to a single monitor session. That too could be
>>> implemented today (as simple as a term_printf("notification: ...\n");
>>
>> No. It is simple on the qemu side only. Parsing notifications poping
>> up at random places in the stream is more complex.
>
> I don't understand why, if there's a common prefix.
>
> Everywhere you expect (qemu), also expect notification:.
Please no more async notifications to the monitors. They are just ugly
to parse, at least for us humans. I don't want to see any notification
in the middle of my half-typed command e.g.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list