Ján Tomko wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > Currently, qemuxml2argvmock.c only mocks virNumaNodeIsAvailable(), and > > only if libvirt was built with NUMA support. This causes some test > > failures where NUMA is involved. > > > > This is misleading, you are probably compiling with clang, which > inlines virNumaGetMaxNode, so the mocked version of it is never called. > > With no NUMA support, even libvirtd uses the implementation of > virNumaNodeIsAvailable based on virNumaGetMaxNode. > And the mocked virNumaNodesetIsAvailable is functionally identical to > the implementation in virnuma.c. > > There were two attempts to get around it: > __attribute__((__noinline__)) > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-March/msg00203.html > and mocking virNumaNodesetIsAvailable by its identical copy: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-March/msg00515.html > (mocking virNumaNodeIsAvailable should not be needed). > > All they need is a decision. It's strange, but neither of these two patches fixes the issue for me. That's with 3.8.0. It starts working only when I pull in both virNumaNodeIsAvailable() and virNumaNodesetIsAvailable() into qemuxml2argvmock.c without the #if WITH_NUMACTL conditional. Roman Bogorodskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list