On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:52:46AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > I think that's going to lead to even more confusion. While I'm inclined > to not greatly mind 0.10.99 for the development tree, when we do release > candidates for the next release, it's going to be 0.11.0-rc1. I don't > expect RPMs to ever be created from non-release versions of QEMU provided > we stick to our plan of frequent releases. FWIW, GDB uses 6.8.50 (devel branch), 6.8.90 (release branch), 6.8.91 (rc1). That's worked out well for us. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list