Re: [PATCH] cpu: add ABM to Haswell* and Broadwell* CPU models

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi jiri,

Thanks for you kindly reviewing, I wonder what cpu/cpu_map.xml does in libvirt if QEMU already provide all features to guest?

Best Regards,
Qiao, Liyong (Eli) OTC SSG Intel
------------------------------------------------
           此致
敬礼!
英特尔(中国)有限公司软件与服务部开源技术中心 乔立勇



              -----Original Message-----
              From: Jiri Denemark [mailto:jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx]
              Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 6:56 PM
              To: Qiao, Liyong <liyong.qiao@xxxxxxxxx>
              Cc: libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
              Subject: Re:  [PATCH] cpu: add ABM to Haswell* and
              Broadwell* CPU models
              
              On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 17:53:04 +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
              > Corresponding QEMU commits:
              >     becb66673ec30cb604926d247ab9449a60ad8b11
              >
              > Signed-off-by: Eli Qiao <liyong.qiao@xxxxxxxxx>
              > ---
              >  src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 4 ++++
              >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
              
              NACK. We don't add features to models since it could break
              existing setups. In any case, presence of any flag in CPU models
              does not really influence whether that flag is going to be provided
              to a guest. That part is driven by QEMU.
              
              Jirka

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]