On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:22:36PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > I've been talking to libssh guys and they did a lot of changes trying to > be more compliant. What do you think about reconsidering the use of > libssh instead of libssh2? I've taken a look at their current SVN repo, and it looks very much improved in quality, so I've no objections to its use now. Regards, Daniel. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list