On 05/02/2016 06:30 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > docs/formatdomain.html.in | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in > index bead624..735546e 100644 > --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in > +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in > @@ -2561,8 +2561,9 @@ > disk to an IOThread as defined by the range for the domain > <a href="#elementsIOThreadsAllocation"><code>iothreads</code></a> > value. Multiple devices may be assigned to the same IOThread and > - are numbered from 1 to the domain iothreads value. > - <span class='since'>Since 1.2.8 (QEMU only)</span> > + are numbered from 1 to the domain iothreads value. Available > + only for virtio-blk-pci and virtio-blk-ccw disks. > + <span class='since'>Since 1.2.8 (QEMU 2.1)</span> > </li> > </ul> > </dd> > Those are qemu specific terms. I'd rather see it spelled out in libvirt terms or something more end user readable. I see this mirrors the <iothreads> docs, instead I think the <iothread> docs should just defer to the per-device docs to describe what device+version combos support iothreads, so we don't need to update that info twice. - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list