On 04/27/2016 03:30 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> We historically format runtime seclabel selinux/apparmor values, >> however we skip formatting runtime DAC values. This was added in >> >> commit 990e46c4542349f838e001d30638872576c389e9 >> Author: Marcelo Cerri <mhcerri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Fri Aug 31 13:40:41 2012 +0200 >> >> conf: Avoid formatting auto-generated DAC labels >> >> to maintain migration compatibility with libvirt < 0.10.0. >> >> However the formatting was skipped unconditionally. Instead only >> skip formatting in the VIR_DOMAIN_DEF_FORMAT_MIGRATABLE case. >> > > This all makes sense, but when I started tying it I've found it may > still cause some problems. Probably. The problem is that I have no > idea whether it's safer to use number or a name as the uid/gid. But > since we have that parsing code in place and this patch is not about > that, so we can deal with that later. > > ACK Thanks, I'll push after the release - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list