2016-04-26 18:42 GMT+03:00 Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxx>:
> The simplest fix would be to just swap peer and address in the set-address
> call for QEMU, but the fact that the problem didn't leap out at anyone
> indicates that the current name "peer" may not be the best choice (even
> though that's what it really is in the netlink message that sets the
> addresses; of course that *won't* be the case after it's fixed - "address"
> will be set as "peer", and "peer" as "address"). So, as I suggested in my
> earlier message, maybe we can come up with a better name for what is now
> called "peer" ("address" must stay the same, since it has already been in
> several releases). Does "hostAddress" sound okay?
>
> Either of these patches (the one to fix the missing attribute in the XML or
> the one to rename the attribute) could be pushed even after DV begins the
> freeze period for the release - they qualify as bug fixes.
>
> (I actually already have a patch to fix the missing peer attribute in the
> XML, and am testing it, so the big question is whether to change the name
> from "peer" to something more accurate, and if so, what to change it to).
Thanks! May be combine Host and Peer to something like HostPeer ? =)
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tolstov@xxxxxxxxx
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list