On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 10:10 -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > > This styling is appropriate when the content of <dt> is a > > <code> element, because that makes the font smaller. > > > > This is the case for most of the <dt>s in our documentation, > > but not *all* of them. I've just posted a patch[1] that fixes > > a bunch of <dt>s that were missing the inner <code> element, > > but that still leaves out a few that are just not supposed to > > have it - look no further than contact.html for an example. > > > > So my proposal is, apply my patch first, and then add > > > > dt code { > > font-weight: bold; > > } > > > > to the stylesheet instead. > > > > Sounds good? > > I saw your series - been a VERY BUSY day on libvir-list... In any case > wouldn't that make *all* <code> elements bolded - there's a lot more of > those and then the <dt> bolding wouldn't stand out Nope, just those inside <dt> - that's what 'dt code' means. Drop those three lines in generic.css and see for yourself :) -- Andrea Bolognani Software Engineer - Virtualization Team -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list