On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 10:10 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> > This styling is appropriate when the content of <dt> is a
> > <code> element, because that makes the font smaller.
> >
> > This is the case for most of the <dt>s in our documentation,
> > but not *all* of them. I've just posted a patch[1] that fixes
> > a bunch of <dt>s that were missing the inner <code> element,
> > but that still leaves out a few that are just not supposed to
> > have it - look no further than contact.html for an example.
> >
> > So my proposal is, apply my patch first, and then add
> >
> > dt code {
> > font-weight: bold;
> > }
> >
> > to the stylesheet instead.
> >
> > Sounds good?
>
> I saw your series - been a VERY BUSY day on libvir-list... In any case
> wouldn't that make *all* <code> elements bolded - there's a lot more of
> those and then the <dt> bolding wouldn't stand out
Nope, just those inside <dt> - that's what 'dt code' means.
Drop those three lines in generic.css and see for yourself :)
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list