On 04/20/2016 08:10 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 04/15/2016 05:21 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: >> I don't think we need to try and support qcow-create or kvm-img >> binaries anymore; everywhere we care about should have a >> /usr/bin/qemu-img. See patches for more details >> >> Cole Robinson (3): >> storage: remove support for /usr/bin/qcow-create >> storage: remove support for /usr/bin/kvm-img >> storage: drop the plumbing needed for kvm-img/qcow-create >> >> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 2 +- >> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 4 +- >> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 131 ++------------------------------------- >> src/storage/storage_backend.h | 9 ++- >> src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c | 21 ++----- >> src/util/virfile.c | 2 +- >> tests/virstoragetest.c | 4 +- >> 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) >> > > ACK series in general (see my note in 3/3)... I always wondered about > the history of this code as I was trudging through it for buildVol. > > Your call on how long you want to wait to see if anyone comes back with > the "no we cannot remove this because" type response (of course there's > always git revert! > Dan probably has the most context on the history here, CCd for his opinion (see patch #1 and #2 for what I could drum up on qcow-create and kvm-img relevancy) - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list