On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:34:21PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:29:02PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:04:00PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > Actually, the buffer is the exact right size, because that > > 'buf.st_size' was filled by a lstat() call, and the POSIX > > semantics for lstat() are that 'st_size' will contain the > > number of bytes in the destination filename. At least that's > > what this post claims.... > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2001/07/msg00301.html > > > > Okay, thanks for double-checking, ACK ! Committed this new virFileResolveLink() patch, and the other pieces of the original patch in this thread Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list