On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 13:55 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID dereferences the pointer, thus if we pass NULL > into virNetDevSetIPAddress it crashes. Regression introduced by > b3d069872ce53eb. > > Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325120 > --- > src/util/virnetdev.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/util/virnetdev.c b/src/util/virnetdev.c > index 712c3bc..0d030a3 100644 > --- a/src/util/virnetdev.c > +++ b/src/util/virnetdev.c > @@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ int virNetDevSetIPAddress(const char *ifname, > unsigned int recvbuflen; > > /* The caller needs to provide a correct address */ > - if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_FAMILY(addr) == AF_INET && !VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID(peer)) { > + if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_FAMILY(addr) == AF_INET && peer && !VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID(peer)) { > /* compute a broadcast address if this is IPv4 */ > if (VIR_ALLOC(broadcast) < 0) > return -1; The other version of virNetDevSetIPAddress() starting on line 1435 needs to be fixed in a similar fashion. Also, doesn't 'addr' need to be checked as well? I'd like to have all of these fixed in a single patch, but this change is good even by itself so it's up to you :) ACK -- Andrea Bolognani Software Engineer - Virtualization Team -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list