Re: [RFC 0/6] Probe and expose GIC capabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 12:38 +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Code looks good to me but I skimmed it. You labelled this an RFC... are you
> > waiting for design comments from other people or should I do a full review?
> > 
> Looking through some of the comments [1] on the previous versions of
> the QEMU patch set for the QMP command, it seems one essential thing
> to get a lock on would be if the interface is sufficient that the QEMU
> code should be merged.
> 
> So if you or others can verify that part, then that's more urgent than
> fine combing through the libvirt code at this point, in my humble
> opinion.
> 
> [1]: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05272.html

Christoffer, thanks a lot for bringing this up!

While I failed to mention it in the cover letter (my bad), the
fact that Peter had asked for an ACK to the interface from
libvirt's side was one of the reasons for sending out this series
sooner rather than later.

Maybe Cole, having skimmed my RFC patches, can provide an
explicit ACK to the QMP interface? I don't feel confident enough
to provide anything more than a weak ACK myself.

Note that v6, posted by Peter earlier today[1], changes the
QMP interface a bit... I believe the changes are not big enough
that updating this series to deal with the changes would be an
issue though.

Cheers.


[1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05441.html
-- 
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]