On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 15:33 -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > While writing the tomb for patch 20, I had one question/issue... You > could have already addressed in your upcoming patches, but I'll ask > anyway before I see them.... > > Essentially combining step5/step6 will *steal* from the inactiveList > (the rich) and give to the activeList (the poor). That's not a problem. > > But, doesn't this mean only managed devices are moved to activeList as > opposed to all possible hostdevs (in pcidevs) - at least during Prepare? > Again it's this whole how does the inactiveList get populated conundrum > (vis-a-vis devices in the guest XML that are not managed). Should be addressed by the small spin-off series I posted yesterday :) Cheers. -- Andrea Bolognani Software Engineer - Virtualization Team -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list